Legal platform

s. 126, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Last Updated:-13-3-2020

AI makes mistakes. Always cross-verify. Everything here is generated by software from the documents and facts you gave us, from the law text we show you, and from what the model knows. Where we reach a conclusion or recommend something we say so and show our working — but nobody has reviewed it, we are not your advocate, your chartered accountant or your company secretary, and your own professional signs and files. Open the source we link on every item and check it before you act. Terms

← Back · Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Last Updated:-13-3-2020 · section 126 · Professional communications.

Outdated. This Act is recorded as superseded by Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (in force 1 Jul 2024).

The section, verbatim

No barrister, attorney, pleader or vakil, shall at any time be permitted, unless with his client’s express consent, to disclose any communication made to him in the course and for the purpose of his employment as such barrister, pleader, attorney or vakil, by or on behalf of his client, or to state the contents or condition of any document with which he has become acquainted in the course and for the purpose of his professional employment, or to disclose any advice given by him to his client in the course and for the purpose of such employment:
Provided that nothing in this section shall protect from disclosure ––
(1) any such communication made in furtherance of any 2[illegal] purpose,
(2) any fact observed by any barrister, pleader, attorney or vakil, in the course of his employment as such, showing that any crime or fraud has been committed since the commencement of his employment.
It is immaterial whether the attention of such barrister, 3[pleader], attorney or vakil was or was not directed to such fact by or on behalf of his client.
Explanation. –– The obligation stated in this section continues after the employment has ceased.
Illustrations
(a) A, a client, says to B, an attorney –– “I have committed forgery, and I wish you to defend me.”
As the defence of a man known to be guilty is not a criminal purpose, this communication is protected from disclosure.
(b) A, a client, says to B, an attorney –– “I wish to obtain possession of property by the use of a forged deed on which I request you to sue.”
This communication, being made in furtherance of a criminal purpose, is not protected from disclosure.
(c) A, being charged with embezzlement, retains B, an attorney, to defend him. In the course of the proceedings, B observes that an entry has been made in A’s account book, charging A with the sum said to have been embezzled, which entry was not in the book at the commencement of his employment.
This being a fact observed by B in the course of his employment, showing that a fraud has been committed since the commencement of the proceedings, it is not protected from disclosure.

text as held by us, updated to 13-3-2020; amendments after that date are not reflected — verify on indiacode.gov.in

Find this Act on indiacode.nic.in — the official text, which is what governs.

What it does

the plain-English reading is written for a signed-in account, because writing it costs that account a model call. The section above is the law itself and needs no account.

AI makes mistakes. Always cross-verify. Everything here is generated by software from the documents and facts you gave us, from the law text we show you, and from what the model knows. Where we reach a conclusion or recommend something we say so and show our working — but nobody has reviewed it, we are not your advocate, your chartered accountant or your company secretary, and your own professional signs and files. Open the source we link on every item and check it before you act. Terms

Sign in to see how this section bears on your own agreements and your calendar.

This is a cited information memo generated from the statute corpus and the approved clause library. It is not legal advice; a decision to sign, negotiate or litigate needs an advocate.